<div dir="ltr"><div>Thanks Elaine! It worked and formed 1 chain out of 2! I had not combined before trying to bond previously. Oddly, I don't see in the bond command description where that is mentioned. Also, I surmise that the "reasonable" modifier is not optional because when I omitted it, it didn't give an error, but said 0 bonds were formed.<br></div><div>Ralph<br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:45 AM Elaine Meng <<a href="mailto:meng@cgl.ucsf.edu">meng@cgl.ucsf.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi Ralph,<br>
Here is an example:<br>
<br>
bond #1/A:25@C #1/A:38@N reasonable false<br>
<br>
... to add a bond in model 1 between residue 25 in chain A, atom name C, and residue 38 in chain A, atom name N.<br>
<br>
Again, you CANNOT make a bond between atoms that are in different models. If you have the pieces in different models you have to combine them into a single model first and then form the bond within the new combined model. And of course, you have to substitute in your residue numbers, chain IDs, and atom names according to what is in your actual structure. <br>
<br>
<<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/bond.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/bond.html</a>><br>
<<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/combine.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/combine.html</a>><br>
<br>
In ChimeraX, you are allowed to give more than 2 atoms and form all pairwise bonds, but you need the "reasonable false" part if you want them even if the distances are too long for a covalent bond.<br>
<br>
If you have trouble with the command-line atom spec part, you could just select the atoms from the screen like I explained in my previous reply and then use command:<br>
<br>
bond sel reasonable false<br>
<br>
<<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/selection.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/selection.html</a>><br>
<br>
I hope this helps,<br>
Elaine<br>
-----<br>
Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D. <br>
UCSF Chimera(X) team<br>
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry<br>
University of California, San Francisco<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
> On Feb 18, 2022, at 4:01 AM, Ralph Loring <<a href="mailto:rhloring@gmail.com" target="_blank">rhloring@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi Tom,<br>
> No, I was running only one subunit (502 amino acids) at a time. I'm trying other approaches with other software now to incorporate the ICD. When I bonded the different domains from multiple pdbs in Chimera, it really did turn into a Frankenstein. Also, I'd seen a youtube presentation suggesting that Modeller could handle more than one pdb, and I was hoping that would work as a way to combine the different domains. That didn't work out either. But as far as learning syntax from the log, that only works for commands that you can run from pull-down menus. All I know is that the syntax for the bond command in ChimeraX is different than the equivalent in Chimera. If someone could just give me an example of a script that picks the atoms and makes a CN peptide bond, that would be very thankful.<br>
> Thanks for all your help,<br>
> Ralph<br>
> <br>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:21 AM Tom Goddard <<a href="mailto:goddard@sonic.net" target="_blank">goddard@sonic.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Ralph,<br>
> <br>
> If you are trying to run alphafold to predict the acetylcholine receptor alpha7 pentamer, that is 2500 total amino acids (500 per alpha7 monmer), then there is no way that is going to run on Google Colab which fails beyond about 1000 amino acids. (Some alphafold size tests here: <a href="https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/data/alphafold-jan2022/afspeed.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/data/alphafold-jan2022/afspeed.html</a>) Colab Pro definitely will not help. Also all Google Colab AlphaFold scripts including what ChimeraX uses run a limited alphafold with no structure templates. See the main AlphaFold Google Colab page for more details<br>
> <br>
> <a href="https://colab.research.google.com/github/deepmind/alphafold/blob/main/notebooks/AlphaFold.ipynb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://colab.research.google.com/github/deepmind/alphafold/blob/main/notebooks/AlphaFold.ipynb</a><br>
> <br>
> If you could install and run full AlphaFold on say an Nvidia RTX 3090 with 24 GB of GPU memory it might succeed (not run out of memory), but it is near the size limit. You would probably need a much more exotic Nvidia A40 (48 Gbytes) or A100 or similar. And even if you run that, you are expecting too much if you think it is going to give you a fully accurate prediction -- AlphaFold produces lots of poor models for large structures.<br>
> <br>
> One more reality check on the capabilities of AlphaFold. It has no option to tell it exactly what PDB templates you want to use -- it chooses the "best 4", I have never seen the criteria documented for what "best 4" means, and further the log output from AlphaFold does not even tell you which 4 templates it uses. You could probably point it to a PDB database with only 7RPM if you wanted to just use that as a template if you can setup your own AlphaFold installation.<br>
> <br>
> In summary, definitely don't expect miracles or ease of use from AlphaFold.<br>
> <br>
> Of course the hand construction of Frankenstein models described by Elaine is likewise no easy task.<br>
> <br>
> Tom<br>
> <br>
>> On Feb 17, 2022, at 3:48 PM, Ralph Loring via ChimeraX-users <<a href="mailto:chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu" target="_blank">chimerax-users@cgl.ucsf.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> Hi Elaine Meng,<br>
>> <br>
>> Thanks so much for your suggestions! However, I’m not thrilled about the Alphafold idea, as I’ve tried to use it for receptors and keep getting booted out before the job finishes (I’d like to get Colab Pro, but I can’t figure out how to sign up with a university credit card; it’s only $0.55 per month in taxes, but my account manager will go ballistic if I pay any taxes and Google doesn’t answer my emails about how to pay with a tax exempt card). Anyway, I got Alphafold to work for a 22 amino acid mu-conotoxin (Mu-Conotoxin P0C349.pdb) and the predicted structure (in blue) wasn’t great (see attached). The RMSD between the Alphafold predicted pdb and the original (tan) was 4.1 angstroms, so not good. If there is some way to guarantee that Alphafold would use the 7RPM.pdb as a model for the intracellular loop, it might work, but the human alpha7 prediction from Alphafold before 7RPM was released (AF-P36544) is not good for the intracellular loop. There is now another Alphafold version (AF-A0A1W2PN81) that is equally bad.<br>
>> <br>
>> Your scripts were incredibly helpful, as I haven’t figured out the syntax for using the command line. Is there a tutorial on using commands in ChimeraX? (I have the list of commands in the user guide [<a href="https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/index.html#commands" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/index.html#commands</a>], but only rarely does that include examples of how the commands are used and I can't figure out the syntax code). What I’d like to do is to delete all the overlapping amino acids in either 7EKI.pdb (which has eGFP in the cytoplasmic loop instead of cytochrome) or 7KOO.pdb with one of the 7RPM ensemble and then bond the ends together to get an approximation of what the intact receptor would look like without overlaps. But I can’t get the bond command correct in a test case using the two versions of mu-contoxin (see attached csx file). I know I want to bond #1Cys22CA to #2Arg1, but I don’t even know how to specify the N-terminal nitrogen. (I can make the bond in Chimera using a combination of Select/Atom Specifier and then Tools/Structure Editing/Build Structure/Join Models, but that approach avoids using commands and I want to know how to do this in ChimeraX). I know I’m going to have to futz with phi and psi after making the bond, but I can’t even get that far (and there's two bonds to make).<br>
>> <br>
>> By the way, Matchmaker does a good job of lining up the overlapping amino acids with any combination of the receptor pdbs. As you can see, they are very comparable (the dotted lines point down rather than up in your method). But I’d like to get a pdb with a single chain for each complete subunit at some point.<br>
>> <br>
>> Thanks for all your help! Any suggestions would be most appreciated.<br>
>> <br>
>> Ralph Loring<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:33 PM Elaine Meng <<a href="mailto:meng@cgl.ucsf.edu" target="_blank">meng@cgl.ucsf.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
>> To clarify, the "alphafold match" command would get already-made single-chain models from the freely available AlphaFold Database. It does not run a new AlphaFold calculation. It just superimposes the single-chain predictions onto the multimer structure that was already open, which is not the same as using it to predict a multimer. However, in practice the result is often quite reasonable, if there are already experimentally known structures with the same type of multimerization.<br>
>> <br>
>> I also meant to include more help links in the previous reply...<br>
>> <br>
>> matchmaker<br>
>> <<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/matchmaker.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/matchmaker.html</a>><br>
>> <br>
>> combine<br>
>> <<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/combine.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/commands/combine.html</a>><br>
>> <br>
>> Model Loops<br>
>> <<a href="https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/tools/modelloops.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/docs/user/tools/modelloops.html</a>><br>
>> <br>
>> Best,<br>
>> Elaine<br>
>> <br>
>> <Superimposed AF- & native Mu-conotoxins.jpg><Bond AF-mu CTX to mu-CTX.cxs><Superimposed 7KOO without BGT and 7RPM Meng's method.jpg><Superimposed 7EKI and 7RPM.jpg><Superimposed 7KOO without BGT and 7RPM.jpg>_______________________________________________<br>
>> ChimeraX-users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:ChimeraX-users@cgl.ucsf.edu" target="_blank">ChimeraX-users@cgl.ucsf.edu</a><br>
>> Manage subscription:<br>
>> <a href="https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimerax-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimerax-users</a><br>
> <br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>