[Chimera-users] Graphics cards for Mac
Tom Goddard
goddard at cgl.ucsf.edu
Tue Mar 4 09:55:38 PST 2008
Here's a comparison of Chimera graphics benchmarks for the current
standard PowerMac graphics versus the top-of-the-line graphics:
Radeon HD 2600 - no additional cost
Quadro FX 5600 - $2850 additional cost
Surfaces and meshes: 1.8x faster
Volume solid style: size 443**3 vs 325**3. Quadro system was limited
32-bit main memory address space.
Molecule: Neglible difference for 34000 atom model in wire, stick, ball
and stick, ribbon, sphere styles.
The Quadro card has 1.5 Gbytes of memory and will probably have
significantly higher performance on solid style volume rendering if the
Chimera volume display code is optimized. Probably adding more main
memory will not help because the limitation is the 32-bit address space
(a limit of Mac OS graphical applications).
The Quadro card did not correctly display volume data in solid style
with 3d textures (solid rendering 2d texture option turned off) --
displayed a chessboard pattern. Did not test 3d textures on Radeon card.
Tom
More information about the Chimera-users
mailing list