[chimerax-users] Proposal to an add on
Tom Goddard
goddard at sonic.net
Wed Aug 31 12:06:33 PDT 2022
Hi Heather,
Here's an idea for plugging the virus capsid holes so you can measure the interior volume. Make an icosahedron surface that blocks the holes, then increase the virus capsid density map values outside the icosahedron so the density is solid (no holes at your threshold level of interest). Then you could subtract the volume inside the modified density map from the volume of the cube to get the interior volume. Here are some commands and images showing the idea.
First make the capsid map from the atomic model.
open 7ns0
sym #1 assembly 1 copies true
molmap #2 8
Then make an icosahedron shape to plug the holes
shape icos radius 160 center #2 orient n25r sphere .5 color yellow
Then make a mask outside the icosahedron
volume onesmask #4 invert true ongrid #3
Then scale and add that mask to the original volume
volume scale #5 factor 10
volume add #3,6
Then measure the volume enclosed by the map surface and the volume in the map cube (by lowering the threshold to less than the lowest density), then subtract
measure volume #7
> Enclosed volume for surface (#6.1) = 5.149e+07
volume #7 level -100
measure volume #7
Enclosed volume for surface (#6.1) = 6.224e+07
Interior volume = 1.075e7 cubic Angstroms (= 6.224e7 - 5.149e7). Comparing to the volume inside the icosahedron
measure volume #4
> Enclosed volume for icosahedron (#4) = 1.345e+07
it makes sense that the virus interior is a bit smaller.
Tom
Capsid map, icosahedron, map holes blocked by icosahedron, mask outside icosahedron, capsid map with density increased outside icosahedron. Some images shown clipped in half for clarity.
> On Aug 31, 2022, at 6:28 AM, Noriega, Heather via ChimeraX-users <chimerax-users at cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I hope everyone is doing well. I know I have asked this before about the molmaps and have been trying to work around the "holes", in order to create a solid map for the inner volume calculation. It works very well with the AAVs, however with the other subfamilies because of their larger pores it makes it to where it is an inconsistent volume contour, and I believe it throws off the inner volume calculations. I propose to add an element to only cover the pores as a means to make the contour thinner to create a more realistic inner volume calculation. I would like to help with this feature, as my skills have improved within the last year since I first started using Chimera and ChimeraX for my project. I am unsure how I go about this and your response.
>
> I have reached out before and most of the time it ends in maybe trying another software. There is no other software that is remotely comparable to this molmap feature that is as user-friendly as it is in ChimeraX. I would really like to continue the use of ChimeraX. I have also thought of possibly trying to create a way for the molecular surface to work with the volume blob feature, but it still comes down to the pores creating the holes. A mechanism to create a feature of only covering the pores could be useful for not only my project but others that may have similar issues. Please let me know what your thoughts are as I would like to contribute to this resolution, but would also need some direction on how to start it. Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Heather Noriega
> PhD-Pharmaceutical Science student
> Howard University
> heather.noriega at bison.howard.edu <mailto:heather.noriega at bison.howard.edu>
> 520-203-1883
> _______________________________________________
> ChimeraX-users mailing list
> ChimeraX-users at cgl.ucsf.edu
> Manage subscription:
> https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/mailman/listinfo/chimerax-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159808 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 97108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 201478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 228568 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image5.png
Type: image/png
Size: 187697 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image6.png
Type: image/png
Size: 119230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/attachments/20220831/4adec321/attachment-0011.png>
More information about the ChimeraX-users
mailing list